PMP Practice: Collect and analyze data to make informed project decisions

Sage Volkov is managing a multi-year infrastructure upgrade for Swift Horizon Labs, involving warehouse automation systems, fleet management software, and network infrastructure across 12 distribution centers. The project is now eight months in, and three work streams have reported critical issues: the automation vendor has discovered foundation load-bearing problems at two facilities requiring structural reinforcement (adding four months and $2.3M), the fleet software integration revealed incompatible legacy systems requiring custom middleware (adding three months and $780K), and the network team identified regulatory compliance gaps requiring additional security controls (adding two months and $450K). Each work stream has submitted revised plans independently. The sponsor has asked Sage to present consolidated recovery options at next week's steering committee meeting, emphasizing that the original business case projected ROI breakeven at 18 months post-deployment, and delays beyond six months would require executive re-approval. Sage has already confirmed the issues are valid and the cost estimates are reasonable. What should Sage do to prepare the most effective recovery recommendation?