Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Forcing/Directing

Forcing (also called directing) is a conflict resolution technique where one party pushes their viewpoint at the expense of others, typically using positional power to resolve the disagreement.

Explanation

Forcing involves one person imposing their solution on the other parties. This is a win-lose approach where the person with more power or authority prevails. It is the most aggressive conflict resolution technique and is generally not recommended by PMI as a default approach.\n\nHowever, forcing can be appropriate in specific situations: when a quick decision is needed and there is no time for discussion, when the issue involves safety or compliance where there is only one correct answer, when an unpopular but necessary action must be taken, or when the decision-maker is confident they are right and the cost of delay outweighs the cost of overriding others.\n\nThe significant drawback of forcing is that it damages relationships, reduces team morale, and discourages future collaboration. Team members who are overruled may become disengaged, resist implementation, or harbor resentment. Forcing should be used sparingly and only when the situation genuinely requires it.

Key Points

  • One party imposes their solution using authority or power (win-lose)
  • Appropriate for emergencies, safety issues, or time-critical decisions
  • Damages relationships and reduces team morale
  • Generally not recommended as a default conflict resolution approach

Exam Tip

Forcing is win-lose and is generally not preferred by PMI. However, it may be the correct answer when the scenario involves an emergency, safety risk, or non-negotiable requirement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.