Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Risk Response Strategies for Threats

Risk response strategies for threats are the five approaches available to address negative risks: avoid, mitigate, transfer, accept, and escalate. Each strategy aims to reduce the probability, impact, or exposure of a threat.

Explanation

When responding to threats, the project manager selects from five strategies. Avoid eliminates the threat by changing the project plan. Mitigate reduces the probability or impact to an acceptable level. Transfer shifts the negative impact to a third party (e.g., insurance or contracts). Accept acknowledges the risk without proactive action, either passively or with a contingency reserve. Escalate moves the risk to a higher authority when it falls outside the project scope.

The choice of strategy depends on the risk's probability, impact, cost of the response, timing, and stakeholder risk appetite. High-priority threats often warrant avoidance or mitigation, while lower-priority threats may be accepted. Transfer is common for financial risks through insurance, bonds, or fixed-price contracts.

After selecting a strategy, the risk register is updated with the chosen response, the risk owner, trigger conditions, contingency and fallback plans, and any secondary risks introduced by the response itself.

Key Points

  • Five strategies: Avoid, Mitigate, Transfer, Accept, Escalate
  • Avoid eliminates the threat; Mitigate reduces probability or impact
  • Transfer shifts impact to a third party; Accept takes no proactive action
  • Escalate moves risks outside project scope to higher authority

Exam Tip

Memorize all five threat strategies. A common exam trap is to offer "Eliminate" as an option—the correct term is "Avoid."

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.